Legal Opinion

Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1986No. C2-86-496PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is an appeal from a dissolution judgment and an order amending the judgment but denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant, Richard Haasken, argues that the trial court’s delay in entering the original judgment and its ex parte communications during that delay warrant a new trial. He also claims that the trial court abused its discretion by granting custody of the children to respondent; by setting the amount and duration of spousal maintenance; by making him responsible for all the tax liability on the sale of marital stock; by valuing a lake lot and by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnier v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Marriage of Theroux v. BoehmlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marriage of Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Letsch v. LetschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API