Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is an appeal from a dissolution judgment and an order amending the judgment but denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant, Richard Haasken, argues that the trial court’s delay in entering the original judgment and its ex parte communications during that delay warrant a new trial. He also claims that the trial court abused its discretion by granting custody of the children to respondent; by setting the amount and duration of spousal maintenance; by making him responsible for all the tax liability on the sale of marital stock; by valuing a lake lot and by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnier v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Theroux v. BoehmlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Letsch v. LetschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.