In Re Winkler
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this opinion, we find that the respondents, Cynthia L. Winkler ("Winkler"), Prosecuting Attorney, and Blaine Goode ("Goode"), Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for Washington County, violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rules 4.1(a), 4.4, and 84(c) and (d). Their misconduct arises from their improper seizure of notes taken by a defendant during a deposition in a criminal proceeding and their attempts to conceal the seizure when questioned by defendant's counsel. For this misconduct, we suspend respondent Wink-ler for one hundred-twenty (120) days, with automatic reinstatement thereafter,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Colman v. HeidenreichIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of DrozdaIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GranackiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Bassett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Reciprocal Discipline of HaderlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.