In Re Reciprocal Discipline of Haderlie

CROTHERS, Justice,

specially concurring.

[¶ 10] I have signed the Court’s decision and offer this separate writing to explain why I want to, but cannot, agree with the dissent;

[¶ 11] I have high confidence that I speak for all of my colleagues in stating we do not condone Attorney Haderlie’s conduct leading to his criminal charge of interfering with a peace officer. However, our application of law requires precision and the result here turns on the distinction between criminal activity and unethical conduct warranting lawyer discipline.

[¶ 12] ' The North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct…