Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Newman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2011No. 49S00-0907-DI-331Published

1Opinion of the Court

958 N.E.2d 792 (2011)

In the Matter of Lawrence T. NEWMAN, Respondent.

No. 49S00-0907-DI-331.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

December 20, 2011.

Attorney for the Respondent Pro se.

G. Michael Witte, Executive Secretary, Dennis K. McKinney, Staff Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.

Attorney Discipline Action Hearing Officer Barbara Collins

2Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Lawrence T. Newman, engaged in attorney misconduct by failing to comply with a client's reasonable requests for an accounting of the hours he worked prior to being discharged, by charging an…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rucker; Dissent · Rucker.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lawrence T. Newman and Beverly R. Newman v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Shannon v. Hendricks Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bennett v. NSR, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API