State v. Granacki
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
The State appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its case against David Granacki based on the conduct of one of the State’s witnesses, a police detective, who remained in the courtroom to assist the prosecutor. The State concedes that the witness’s conduct was improper but argues it was not so egregious that dismissal was warranted. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the underlying action.
FACTS
Granacki was charged with two counts of second degree robbery, one count of attempted second degree robbery, one count of third degree theft, and one count of fourth degree assault.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. CoryWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. StarrishWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. KoerberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Peña FuentesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. WebbeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.