Legal Opinion

El Dorado Terminal Co. v. General American Tank Car Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1939No. 8799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying to appellant, plaintiff below, recovery of moneys collected by the appel-lee, defendant below, as agent for appellant, from several interstate railways.

The case is at law, the jury was waived and the court based its judgment against appellant El Dorado Terminal Company, hereinafter referred to as the El Dorado Company on special findings and its conclusions of law.

The El Dorado Oil Works, a corporation owning and operating a vegetable oil refining plant at Berkeley, California, entered into a leasing contract with the ap-pellee…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DiffenbaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. El Dorado Oil Works v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945
  3. El Dorado Oil Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API