Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The defendant has pressed its motion for judgment of nonsuit with vigor and conviction. However, taking the plaintiff’s evidence as true and in its most favorable light for her, the accepted position on a motion of this kind, it appears that about three inches of the treads on the stairway were “smooth and slippery, worn extremely smooth and slick, and the outer edge of the tread was worn slick as glass,” rendering the stairway unsafe and dangerous. This would seem to carry the case to the jury, even if it be conceded that the remaining evidence of “shaky steps and railing” is too…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Wallace v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Owens v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.