Electronic Arts, Inc. v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Electronic Arts, Inc. (“EA”) petitions for a writ of mandamus from the district court’s order denying its Motion for Administrative Relief to File Document Under Seal. We grant the petition.
*569On a “mandamus petition, we review the district court’s orders, not for an abuse of discretion, but for clear error.” Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp., 320 F.3d 989, 998 (9th Cir.2003). “Five objective principles guide the inquiry: whether (1) [petitioner] has no other adequate means, such as direct appeal, to attain the relief, (2) [petitioner] will be damaged or prejudiced in a way not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lawrence S. Bittaker v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison of San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by204 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- AFL Telecommunications LLC v. SurplusEQ.Com Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- MMI, INC. v. Baja, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Northbay Healthcare Grp. - Hosp. Div. v. Blue Shield of Cal. Life & Health Ins.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Mgmt. Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.