Legal Opinion
Center for Legal Advocacy v. Earnest
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 22, 2002No. 1:01-cv-00642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRIMMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Center For Legal Advocacy (“CLA”), seeks a permanent injunction and declaratory relief granting it unfettered access to certain medical records, pursuant to the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act (“PAIMI”), 42 U.S.C. § 10801 et seq., and the Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights Act (“PAIR”), 29 U.S.C. § 794e. Defendants dispute Plaintiffs asserted entitlement, claiming they are precluded from releasing the information sought without ensuring the privacy safeguards imposed by the Public Health Service Act. 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Jenkins v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Ohio Legal Rights Service v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Disability Rights Ohio v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Center for Legal Advocacy v. EarnestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.