Legal Opinion
Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. Armstrong
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2003No. 3:01 CV 1118 DJSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Protection and Advocacy for Mentally Ill Individuals Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801-10827 (“PAMII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“ § 1983”). Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as this action arises under 42 U.S.C. §§ 10801-10827 and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Now pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.
I. FACTS
Examination of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Virginia v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Connecticut Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. Hartford Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Protection & Advocacy System, Inc. v. FreudenthalDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
- Ohio Legal Rights Service v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Disability Rights Wisconsin, Inc. v. State Of Wisconsin Department Of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.