United States v. Beard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
James Bowden Beard appeals from his conviction for money laundering and various related offenses. Beard contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on violations of Fed.R.Crim.P. 23(b) and 24(c). Although the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding just cause to remove two jurors, the court erred in substituting two alternate jurors in violation of Rule 24(c). We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND
Beard was indicted on money laundering and related charges. His jury trial began on September 4,1996, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Richard AnnigoniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jaime Leon Gomez-NorenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. John Fife Symington, Iii, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. DecoudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Amesheo D. CannonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.