Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Annigoni
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1996No. 94-50422PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge LEAVY; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
This case asks us to reconsider the longstanding principle that automatic reversal of a conviction is the proper remedy where a trial court erroneously deprives a criminal defendant of the right of peremptory challenge.
Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Richard Annigoni (“Annigoni”) was convicted of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Annigoni appealed his conviction on two grounds. He challenged the district court’s pre-trial ruling limiting cross-examination of a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Robert Rodriguez v. At&t Mobility Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.