Legal Opinion

United States v. Decoud

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2006No. 04-50318, 04-50374, 04-50478PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (“DEA”) investigation and the prosecution of a drug-trafficking organization in Riverside, California. Sedrick Decoud, Kendra Trice, and Audra Israel (collectively, “the appellants”) challenge their convictions and sentences for engaging in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine base and, in Decoud’s case, for being a felon in possession of a firearm. They raise a number of issues ranging from the government’s non-disclosure of its confi*1000dential informant’s identity to the district court’s dismissal of a juror based…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API