Legal Opinion
Bishop v. National RR Passenger Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1999No. 2:98-cv-03852PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Lorraine E. Bishop, Doreen Cain, Judy Morris, and Patricia Thompson (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action on July 23, 1998 against Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Defendant”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 1 Plaintiffs seek damages for claims of sex discrimination and sexual harassment.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
We have before us Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to intérrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hargrave v. County of AtlanticDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Goins v. West GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Anderson v. Deluxe Homes of PA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Gautney v. Amerigas Propane, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.