Legal Opinion
Gautney v. Amerigas Propane, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-197PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Jill M. Gautney (“Gautney”) claims that defendant AmeriGas Propane, Incorporated (“AmeriGas”) discriminated against her in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. (“Title VII”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act 43 P.S. § 951 (“PHRA”). Gautney also claims that Am-eriGas breached her employment contract and violated the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, 43 P.S. § 260.1 et seq. (“WPCL”).
Currently before the court is the motion of AmeriGas for summary judgement (Document No. 11).…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Industries for the Blind & HandicappedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Hobson v. St. Luke's Hospital & Health NetworkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Mosakowski v. PSS World Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Zelinski v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Walsh v. Alarm Security Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.