Legal Opinion
Alberty v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1941No. 9273PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission requiring petitioner, Adah Alberty, to cease and desist from making certain representations which the Commission held to constitute unfair methods of competition in commerce, within the meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 41-51. Petitioner’s brief specifies as error,1 not the entire order, but only so much thereof as requires petitioner to cease and desist from representing:
That the preparations called Alberty’s Food Regular and Alberty’s Food Instant' (new style), or any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- International Art Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Dr. W. B. Caldwell, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Justin Haynes & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- John J. Fulton Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Irwin v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Stauffer Laboratories, Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Philip R. Park, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.