Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Balme
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 9, 1928No. 86PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission issued an order against the respondent, directing him to cease and desist from certain practices found by it to constitute methods of unfair competition, in violation of section 5 of the act (38 Stat. 717). The order directed the respondent to cease and desist (1) from using the coined word “Oréal,” either standing alone or in connection with any prefix thereto, as a trade-name or descriptive name for a henna hair dye, when sold and distributed in interstate commerce; (2) from using the same word upon the containers,in which the hair dye is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Baltimore Bedding Corp. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- American Airlines, Inc. v. North American Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.