Legal Opinion
Philip R. Park, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1943No. 9907PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Here for review is an order of the Federal Trade Commission “that [petitioner], Philip R. Park, Inc., a corporation, its officers, representatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale or distribution of their products ‘Granular Parkelp’ or ‘Parkelp Tablets,’1 or any other product of substantially similar composition or possessing substantially similar properties, whether sold under the same name or any other name, do forthwith cease and desist from directly or indirectly :
“1.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Juvenile Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Alberty v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Electro Thermal Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abel Allan Goodman, an Individual Trading as Weavers Guild v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Stanley Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Jacques De Gorter, and Suze C. Degorter, as Individuals and as Co-Partners, Trading as Pelta Furs v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Alberty v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950