Legal Opinion

Dobbins v. Redden

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. C-8160PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

This cause presents the issue of whether a party which fails to establish substantial performance of a building contract may nevertheless sustain an action under that contract. The court of appeals rendered judgment allowing the plaintiff to recover damages in a contract action despite a jury finding that the plaintiff had himself breached the contract. 759 S.W.2d 477. We grant the writ of error, modify the judgment of the court of appeals, and affirm that judgment as modified.

Plaintiff Roy Redden agreed to build an earthen tank and dam on defendant Robert Dobbins’ property for…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vance v. My Apartment Steak House of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Atkinson v. Jackson Bros.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by131 opinions

  1. Mustang Pipeline Co. v. Driver Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Centex Corp. v. DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. AielloTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Chilton Insurance Co. v. Pate & Pate Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Zaida Villarreal v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API