Commonwealth v. Bortz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
The issue before our Court is whether a prior indirect criminal contempt conviction for violation of a Protection from Abuse (PFA) order issued under 23 Pa.C.S. § 6108 is grounds for grading a subsequent first conviction for stalking as a felony of the third-degree under 18 Pa.C.S. § 2709.1. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that this' type of prior conviction does constitute grounds to impose a third-degree felony gradation. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Superior Court.
The circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as follows. In June 2001,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MalenoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dechert LLP v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- St. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Deparment of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Faison, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Philomeno & Salamone v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.