Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bortz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2006No. 114 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

The issue before our Court is whether a prior indirect criminal contempt conviction for violation of a Protection from Abuse (PFA) order issued under 23 Pa.C.S. § 6108 is grounds for grading a subsequent first conviction for stalking as a felony of the third-degree under 18 Pa.C.S. § 2709.1. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that this' type of prior conviction does constitute grounds to impose a third-degree felony gradation. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Superior Court.

The circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as follows. In June 2001,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. MedleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MalenoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dechert LLP v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. St. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Deparment of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Com. v. Faison, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Philomeno & Salamone v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API