Legal Opinion

Dechert LLP v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2010No. 12 MAP 2008PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this direct appeal from the Commonwealth Court, we consider whether “canned” computer software1 constitutes “tangible personal property,” such that the purchase of such software is subject to sales tax under the Tax Reform Code, 72 P.S. § 7201 et seq. (the “Code”).2 For the reasons that follow, we conclude that canned computer software is tangible personal property, and, therefore, that purchases thereof are taxable.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Appellant Dechert LLP (“Dechert”) is a limited liability partnership which provides legal services. Between November 2,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Rendell v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. McClellan v. Health Maintenace OrganizationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Roethlein v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Tooey v. AK Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Meyer v. Community College of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Snyder Bros., Inc. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API