Legal Opinion

Philomeno & Salamone v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 2009No. 105 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

On June 5, 2003, appellant, equitable owner of 18.67 acres in Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, submitted an application to the township’s Board of Supervisors to subdivide the property into two parcels, and to further subdivide one of those parcels into 17 residential lots. The Board twice requested extensions of time to make a decision; § 508 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. § 10508, provides a municipality must take action on an application within 90 days of the next meeting of its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Coretsky v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Kassouf v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Hydropress Environmental Services, Inc. v. Township of Upper Mount BethelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pennsbury Village Associates, LLC v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Twp. v. Hansen-Lloyd, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. In re Appeal of P-Ville AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Gaughen LLC v. Borough Council of the Borough of MechanicsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. SEPTA v. City of Philadelphia and Philadelphia Commission on Human RelationsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API