Legal Opinion

McKinney v. United States Department of the Treasury

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 23, 1985No. Court 84-9-01320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum, Opinion and Order

DiCARLO, Judge.

Members of Congress, a shareholder, a labor union, and five organizations seek to exclude from entry into the United States various products mined, produced, or manufactured in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Soviet Union) allegedly by convict, forced, or indentured labor (forced labor). 1

Defendants move to dismiss the action alleging plaintiffs lack standing and the action is moot. The motion is granted.

I

In February 1983, the United States Department of State sent to the Congress its Report on Forced Labor in the U.S.S.R. accompanied by a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bhullar v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  2. International Labor Rights Fund v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  4. Ninestar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  5. International Labor Rights Fund v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API