Legal Opinion
Bhullar v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 26, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-36; 02-00668PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Rule 12(b)(1), the defendants, the United States of America and the United States International Trade Commission, move to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants contend that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case. Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motions, asserting that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) or alternatively, under § 1581®. The Court has jurisdiction to resolve this question under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c). For…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Thomas A. Vincel v. White Motor Corporation and Glenn F. KommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tembec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Bhullar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- North Dakota Wheat Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance v. BashamUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.