Legal Opinion

China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 7, 1994No. Court 92-10-00696PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge:

On June 2, 1994, the court denied cross-motions for summary judgment and ordered trial in this matter. See China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United States, 855 F.Supp. 380 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1994). That opinion sets forth all relevant background information. To summarize, in March 1992 diesel engines manufactured by plaintiff China Diesel Imports, Inc. (“CDI”) were excluded by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) as goods made by convict or forced labor. CDI has filed suit seeking entry of its merchandise. Thus, it has the burden of proof. Id. at 386. The two basic…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McKinney v. United States Department of the TreasuryUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Posco v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. WWRD U.S., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  3. Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  4. SeAH Steel VINA Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API