Legal Opinion
Lasalle Talman Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 8, 2005No. 92-652CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Only the issue of damages remains in this Winstar-related1 case, which is on remand from the Federal Circuit. See LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, 317 F.3d 1363 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“LaSalle II"). Plaintiff, LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. (“LaSalle”), offers two damages claims: lost profits and eost-of-replacement-eapital. A second trial was held. The matter has been fully briefed and orally argued. This court’s judgment of September 30, 1999, is vacated. For reasons set out below, we find that plaintiff’s lost *92profits claim was not established with reasonable…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Michael L. Rockwell, and Regina Rockwell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kansas Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Globe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.