Legal Opinion

Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 30, 2006No. 98-126CPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER1

MEROW, Senior Judge.

Three nuclear utilities seek damages for the Department of Energy’s (“DOE”)’s *251breach of contract to accept, transport, and dispose of their spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”).2 Substantial storage costs for SNF are borne by utility ratepayers whose rates also reflect the $440.5 ± million paid or to be paid to DOE under the contracts involved. Breach of contract by the United States has been established. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. United States, 225 F.3d 1336, 1342 (Fed.Cir.2000). Plaintiffs seek to recover their incurred SNF storage costs from the United…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API