Probasco v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
This case is the sequel to City of Reno v. District Court, 84 Nev. 322, 440 P.2d 395 (1968), wherein we mandated dismissal of the City’s abandoned condemnation action against the property owner Probasco, but ordered retention of Probasco’s counterclaim for independent adjudication. The merit of his counterclaim was not there considered. The issue raised thereby was later tried to a jury, relief denied, and from the judgment entered upon jury verdict, Probasco has appealed to this court.
The dispositive appellate question is whether an abutting property owner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Boyd v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Meredith v. Washoe County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Professional Plaza, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- 8,960 Square Feet, More or Less v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Frederic & Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust v. MacDonald Highlands Realty, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.