Legal Opinion

Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2013No. 58609PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we address whether the district court properly concluded that, under the particular circumstances and' surroundings of the case, a proposed residential wind turbine would constitute a nuisance warranting a permanent injunction against its construction. Below, respondents Forest Hills Subdivision, Ann Hall, and Karl Hall (collectively, the Halls) sought to permanently enjoin their neighbor, appellant Rick Sowers, from constructing a wind turbine on his residential property, asserting that the proposed turbine would constitute a nuisance.1 The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Residents Opposed Turbines v. State EfsecWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cook v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. Wernke v. HalasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Commission on Ethics v. HardyNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hay v. HayNevada Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. v. Westland Liberty Vill.Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF CHRISTOPHER R. ARABIANevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS GEN. ASS'N VS. LAS VEGAS METRO. POLICE DEP'TNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. TOYO TIRE NORTH AMERICA MANUFACTURING, INC. v. DAVIS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API