Legal Opinion

Trincia v. Testardi

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 28, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

This is the determination after final hearing of the complainant’s right as one of the heirs at law of the deceased partner to maintain this accounting action against the surviving partner, even though there is an administrator (intended to include the administratrix) for the estate of the deceased partner.1

This court concluded at the demurrer stage2 that the *185factual allegations of the bill of complaint were sufficient to entitle the complainant to maintain this action for an accounting. Trincia, v. Testardi, ante p. 42, 52 A. 2d 871. Complainant now insists that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoag v. AldermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  3. Jones v. TuckerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1912
  4. Trincia v. TestardiCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2001
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Airtemp Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Lutz v. BoasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  4. Lutz v. BoasCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  5. Dorsey v. State Ex Rel. MulrineSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API