Legal Opinion

Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 17, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor.

This is the decision of the court with respect to certain petitions for allowances based on alleged compensable services rendered in the so-called Penn-road-Pennsylvania Railroad litigation. The court is also required to determine whether an alleged agreement between two of the attorneys—with respect to a division of their fees—is here enforceable.

Before entering into a discussion of the various petitions, I should like to point out that the right to compensation does not flow automatically from the performance of services in cases of this type, no matter how…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
  4. Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Stabler v. RamsayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  5. Ingalls v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API