Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice-Chancellor.
This is the decision of the court with respect to certain petitions for allowances based on alleged compensable services rendered in the so-called Penn-road-Pennsylvania Railroad litigation. The court is also required to determine whether an alleged agreement between two of the attorneys—with respect to a division of their fees—is here enforceable.
Before entering into a discussion of the various petitions, I should like to point out that the right to compensation does not flow automatically from the performance of services in cases of this type, no matter how…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Overfield v. Pennroad CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Stabler v. RamsayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Ingalls v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.