Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiffs, minority shareholders of defendant Mirror Image Internet, Inc. (“Mirror Image”), have brought an action challenging a series of transactions (the “Challenged Transactions”) involving defendants Mirror Image, its majority shareholder, Xcelera.com, Inc. (“Xcelera”), and three individuals who serve on the board of directors of both Xcelera and Mirror Image (the “Director Defendants”). In addition to asserting a litany of claims based upon each Transaction, plaintiffs have argued that the sum total of the claims demonstrate a coherent strategy and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- In re Wayport, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In Re ORACLE CORP DERIVATIVE LITIGATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Sample v. MorganCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.