Legal Opinion

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. Peden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1922No. 14401PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Second Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

Appellant, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, a creditor of the South Chicago Architectural Iron Works, thereafter reorganized as the Illinois Architectural Iron Works, filed its second amended bill in equity in May, 1919, against said company and all its stockholders, charging that the company ceased doing business leaving debts unpaid; that the stockholders of the company, while acting as directors, had accepted from themselves property in full payment of their subscriptions for stock which was of far less value than the par value of the stock for which they had subscribed, and therefore, under the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Parmelee v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Coleman v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Wincock v. TurpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ray Schools-Chicago-Inc. v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Continental Motors Corp. v. Township of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Aiken v. InsullCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Thomason v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Belmont v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API