Belmont v. Gentry
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the Hill City Bank, being insolvent on July 18, 1932, suspended business and- was taken in charge by the superintendent of banks; that thereafter, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 90, Laws of 1931, an order was made by the circuit court of Pennington county removing the liquidation of the -bank from the control of the superintendent of banks, and placing the liquidation thereof under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- In re Beachy & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1909
- Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. PedenIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Hodde v. NobbeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Jesson v. NoyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Himrich v. WalterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Belmont v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Belmont v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993