Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Insull

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 22, 1941No. 7430PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

In this case plaintiffs, on their own behalf as owners and holders of corporate debentures and on behalf of all other owners and holders of such debentures and all other creditors who desired to join in the suit and share the costs thereof, sought an accounting from the defendants, directors of the Insull Utility Investments, Inc., for the wrongful pledging of assets in violation of certain debenture covenants and for the improper declaration of dividends. The defendants interposed an affirmative defense and moved for summary judgment against the plaintiffs, filed under…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Parmelee v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. SEC. Nat. Bank v. Peters, Writer & ChristensenColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. WainerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Mitchell v. WeigerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Essington v. ParishCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  5. First Congregational Church & Society of Burlington v. Evangelical & Reformed ChurchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API