Alspaugh v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF BOULDER
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
This is an original proceeding in which we issued a rule to show cause why the district court had not exceeded its jurisdiction in refusing to compel arbitration according to an arbitration provision in a construction contract. We discharge the rule.
On March 12, 1974, Paul Mullins Construction Co., (hereinafter “Contractor”) and Mark H. and Juanita S. Alspaugh, (hereinafter “Homeowners”), entered into a contract for the construction of a home in Boulder County. The contract contained an arbitration clause which reads as follows;
“Article ¡5 Arbitration. All claims or disputes arising out of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leonhart v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Prinster v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Gillette v. BrookhartMercer County Court of Common Pleas · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. CNG Financial Corp. v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Coquina Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Fisher v. County Court of the City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hunter v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Pueblo v. Pueblo Ass'n of Government EmployeesColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.