Legal Opinion

Hunter v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 13, 1977No. 27591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an original proceeding seeking relief in the nature of mandamus or prohibition pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause. We now discharge the rule as being improvidently granted.

C.A.R. 21 may be utilized where the district court is proceeding without jurisdiction or in excess of its jurisdiction. The issues which are now framed in this court hinge upon the asserted error of the trial judge in consolidating into one count seven counts of theft originally set forth in the criminal information. The consolidation occurred as a result of a defense motion which asserted that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prinster v. District Court of Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Gill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Cameron v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR FIRST JUD. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Sweek v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. In re PackerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jeffrey v. District Court In & For the Eighth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Sumler v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API