Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Brookhart

Mercer County Court of Common Pleas

Decided August 11, 1954No. 14286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*495OPINION

By DULL, J.

The demurrer of the defendant lessor to the amended petition of the plaintiff lessee based on the grounds that it allegedly does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was submitted to the court upon the memorandum of counsel for the defendant lessor and the later oral arguments of counsel for the plaintiff lessee and of counsel for the defendant lessor.

The amended petition of the plaintiff lessee omitting the caption, jurat and signatures reads as follows:

“Plaintiff says defendants, Dora M. Brookhart and The National Bank of Lima are the duly appointed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. BuddenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Standard Roofing Co. v. John G. Johnson & Sons Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  4. Alspaugh v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF BOULDERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API