Legal Opinion
Coquina Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 26, 1981No. 80SA415PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOHR, Justice:
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we issued a rule to show cause why the respondent district court should not be directed to grant the petitioners’ motion for immediate use of a right-of-way across lands owned by respondent Harry Kourlis Ranch (Kourlis). The motion was filed in an action brought by the petitioners to condemn the right-of-way in order to obtain access to real property covered by federal oil and gas leases held by them. See section 38-1-101 to 121, C.R.S. 1973 (1979 Supp.). We have concluded that this is not an appropriate case for exercise *41of our original jurisdiction, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lucas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Sutterfield v. District Court in and for Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Town of Glendale v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. District Court of the 2nd Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. DarlingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Vinton v. VirziSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. District Court, Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.