Legal Opinion

In Re Bracewell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1998No. C-970157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

Theodore Bracewell appeals from the juvenile court’s denial of his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment. We find defendant’s assignment of error to be without merit, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Bracewell was charged in juvenile court with carrying a concealed weapon, a felony of the third degree if committed by an adult. Bracewell admitted the charge, and the juvenile court adjudicated him a delinquent child. The court ordered him permanently committed to the Department of Youth Services (“DYS”), but suspended the commitment,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re AglerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In re CaldwellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In re Young ChildrenOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Linger v. WeissOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re BoldenOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CrossOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re CrossOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Carrie A.O., Unpublished Decision (2-24-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. In Re Kiser, Unpublished Decision (11-13-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API