Legal Opinion

In re Cross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2002No. 2001-0152PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 328.] IN RE CROSS. [Cite as In re Cross,

2002-Ohio-4183.] Juvenile court—Juvenile court does not have jurisdiction to reimpose a suspended commitment to the Department of Youth Services facility after a juvenile has been released from probation. (No. 2001-0152—Submitted December 12, 2001—Decided September 11, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2000CA00122. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT A juvenile court does not have the jurisdiction to reimpose a suspended commitment to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In re AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. KirschOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re B.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. In re W.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In re J.F.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API