Legal Opinion

In re Caldwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. Nos. 95-574 and 95-718PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

The issue before the court is whether juvenile courts may impose consecutive terms of commitment upon a delinquent minor. To reach the proper conclusion in this matter, the court must look at the legislative intent behind juvenile commitment orders.

Juvenile delinquency is a serious issue in our society. The question has been and continues to be — What does one do with a child who commits serious offenses? The legislative purpose regarding such errant children has been laid out in R.C. 2151.01: to provide for the care, protection, and mental and physical development of children, to protect the…

2Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re C.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In re H.V.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In re W.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API