Legal Opinion

In re Cross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2002No. 2001-0152PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} In this case we address the issue of whether a juvenile court has the jurisdiction to reimpose a suspended commitment to a Department of Youth Services facility after a juvenile has been released from probation. We find that a juvenile court has no such jurisdiction.

Factual Background

{¶ 2} Appellant Clayton Cross was charged with one count of delinquency for burglary on February 10, 1998, in case No. J-101241. On February 23, 1998, Cross admitted the charge of burglary, a second degree felony if committed by an *329adult (R.C. 2911.12[C]), and was committed by the Stark County Juvenile…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. In re AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In re S.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. KirschOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re CrossOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re B.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In re W.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API