Legal Opinion
Davis v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1954No. Civ. 15976PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrat, J.
Plaintiff appeals from á judgment after jury verdict, in favor of defendants.
Question Pbesented
The refusal of the court to give offered instructions concerning certain rules of defendants’ employer, the State Belt Railroad.
Evidence
The action was for injuries received by plaintiff when run over by a car or cars of the State Belt Railroad, an agency of the State of California. The sole defendants were two employees of that line, Johnson, the engineer, and Locke, foreman in charge. The accident occurred about 1:15 a. m. near Pier 56, Port of San Francisco. The tram’s crew consisted of defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Dillenbeck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.