Glick & Dolleck, Inc. v. Tri-Pac Export Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.
In this action to recover the sales price of “ Salty Dog ” scrubdenims sold by plaintiff to defendant, the Appellate Division has affirmed Special Term’s order granting summary judgment and the judgment entered thereon.
We are told that ‘ ‘ scrubdenim ’ ’ is ordinary denim fabric which is put through a scrubbing or brushing process so as to create a nap on the fabric. According to plaintiff’s supporting affidavit, defendant purchased the scrubdenims by orders of April 18, 1966 and May 11, 1966, aggregating $21,248.32. On the bottom of each invoice appeared the words “ am, risks on these goods…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Barrett v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by147 opinions
- Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Karaduman v. Newsday, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Yelder v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- United National Ins. Co. v. The Tunnel, Inc. v. Jeffrey BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.