Legal Opinion
Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1978PublishedCited by 209 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Breitel.
Plaintiff Alvord & Swift, subcontractor on a construction project for the renovation of a New York Telephone Company facility, seeks damages due to delays incurred in the performance of its subcontract. Named as defendants were: the general contractor, Stewart M. Muller Construction Co., and Stewart M. Muller; the owner, New York Telephone; and the architects. From two separate orders at Special Term, one granting summary judgment under CPLR 3212 to New York Telephone and the other under CPLR 3211 dismissing two causes of action against the architects,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Cohen v. City Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Health-Chem Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- S & K Sales Co. v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Rich v. LefkovitsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.