Legal Opinion
Burk v. Medical Savings Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 8, 2004No. CV 04-1802-PHX-NVWPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WAKE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendant Medical Savings Insurance Company’s (“MSIC”) Supplemental Brief in Support of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Based on Amount in Controversy in Excess of $75,000 Under .28 U.S.C. § 1332. (doc. # 11.) Defendant submitted that brief in response to the Court’s Order of November 12, 2004, requiring Defendant to either acknowledge that it does not contend that it is more likely than not that Plaintiffs will recover more than $75,000 if they prevail on their claims or submit admissible evidence that Plaintiffs’ damages meet the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Apton v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Welsh v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Dalby v. Ditech Fin. LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2018
- Reames v. AB Car Rental Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Shoemaker v. Sentry Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.