Legal Opinion
Reames v. AB Car Rental Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 8, 2012No. Case No. 3:11-cv-1448-PKPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
On February 2, 2012, Magistrate Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation (# 22) recommending that plaintiffs Motion to Remand (# 5) be granted. Defendant timely filed objections through his counsel (# 24), and plaintiff has filed his response. (#25.) The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ■§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate’s report. See 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wardlow v. U-Haul Int'l, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Bensussen Deutsch & Associations LLC v. MollinsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Uhlmeyer v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020