Legal Opinion

City of Bessemer v. Schanz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1933No. 6 Div. 236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The appellee, alleging that he is the owner of certain real property in the city of Bessemer, that said city, the appellant here, is claiming a lien on said property under an ordinance for local improvements, and is threatening to advertise and sell said property thereunder in satisfaction of an alleged assessment for said improvements, filed this bill' to enjoin the sale, and to cancel the alleged lien as a cloud on his title.

The bill alleges: That the ordinance is void for the reason that the assessment was made for sanitary drainage, and complainant’s property was not within the area…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Buchmann Abstract & Investment Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Jasper Land Co. v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. King v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Freeman v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herren v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. City of Bessemer v. SchanzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Bank for Savings & Trusts v. Jefferson Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API