Legal Opinion

Herren v. Beck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1935No. 5 Div. 213PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

One purpose of the original suit is to cause land to be sold for division among the heirs of S. W. Herren, Sr. Among his heirs were two sons, W. A. Herren and S. W. Herren, Jr. The latter was also dead when this suit was filed. The bill alleges that said W. A. Herren and his wife had on December 8, 1933, filed a bill in equity seeking to set aside a deed they had made to said S. W. Herren, Jr., for the causes which will be here referred to. The bill in this suit sought to have those two causes consolidated. It was so ordered. Thereupon said W. A. Herren and wife filed an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Robinson v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Rea v. Longstreet & SedgwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Woodstock Iron Co. v. FullenwiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Wilkinson v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Craig v. RootSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Ex Parte Flexible Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Teal v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Merrill v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API